As said above, the SIPOA agreed. But it had been Erroneous to take action. It wasn't the SIPOA’s spot to unilaterally abandon the easement, considering that other functions had Unique property interest in it – namely, the homeowners of tons 21-28 that benefitted from the drainage easement. The law aims https://illegalencroachmentslawye34562.blogunteer.com/30381103/the-fact-about-leasehold-and-tenancy-advocate-in-karachi-near-me-that-no-one-is-suggesting